Christina Haack denied the allegations her ex-husband Ant Anstead manufactured in opposition to her in his petition for full custody of their 2-12 months-old son Hudson. Here’s what the English Tv presenter claimed about the HGTV star in court files, and how she responded.
Ant Anstead was denied his crisis buy for whole custody of his 2-year-previous son with Christina Haack
On Apr. 28, TMZ documented that Ant Anstead submitted for full custody of his son with Christina Haack. He accused the Flip or Flop star of endangering the toddler and placing him at professional medical chance.
Anstead cited Haack’s expertise with hallucinogenic toad venom as an example of her being a negative guardian. He mentioned she exploits their boy or girl by submitting pics of him on social media for paid out adverts.
The English Tv set also claimed that he by now has Hudson for most of the time, despite his and Haack’s shared custody arrangement. Anstead’s files asked for an quick, emergency transform to make Haack’s custody agenda “alternating weekends, Friday at 4:00 p.m. right up until Sunday at 6:00 p.m. commencing May perhaps 6, 2022, in California only, and other than for vacations” (for every Folks).
He reportedly said that it would “allow Christina’s time to be stepped-up over the subsequent various months to match the timetable she has with her other children.”
A choose denied Anstead’s emergency purchase for comprehensive custody just hours soon after he submitted the petition. Haack and Anstead will both have the probability to show up at a custody listening to scheduled for June 28.
Christina Haack slammed Ant Anstead for striving to ‘tarnish her superior name’ amid their custody dispute
Christina Haack slammed Ant Anstead’s accusations, saying that her ex was seeking to “tarnish [her] good name with his wrong allegations.” In authorized files obtained by Site Six, Haack reportedly wrote a letter offering proof she thinks supports her statements that the English Television set presenter lied.
“I will not speculate as to his real motivations, but Hudson’s finest desire is not what is motivating his software to the Court docket,” the Flip or Flop star wrote.
She claimed that Anstead declined her delivers of private judging and mediation. Haack said her ex was trying to use their son to “create a phony narrative and smear [her] good name.” She also said that Anstead has commenced to “harass” individuals near to her, including her publicist and nanny.
The ‘Flip or Flop’ star introduced proof that she believes exhibits her ex-partner lied
Christina Haack’s statement refuted nearly all of Ant Anstead’s allegations. Regarding his request to adjust their custody settlement, the HGTV star wrote that their existing arrangement will allow her to have Hudson “at the identical time” as her two children from her first relationship to Tarek El Moussa.
“[Anstead] states he wishes me to have a ‘step-up plan’ that would eventually match what I have with my other youngsters,” Haack wrote. “He omits the fact that for every the terms of our judgment, I already have a matching timetable for all three young children.”
One more piece of proof the Flip or Flop star supplied was the Persons journal deal with Anstead appeared on with their son, suggesting that his claim that he “never used” Hudson as a “promotional tool” was fake.
She did not deny “illegal drug use on July 08, 2021” (referring to her cigarette smoking Bufo toad venom, which she has referred to as a “life-changing” knowledge). But she wrote that her ex unsuccessful to admit that he remaining for the United kingdom “shortly thereafter, leaving Hudson in [her] treatment for 10 days.”
Linked: Which of Christina Haack’s Ex-Husbands Has the Increased Web Truly worth, Tarek El Moussa or Ant Anstead?
